Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gaines v. Zhou et al
as 1:2023cv06561
Plaintiff:
Jacobi Gaines
Defendant:
Y. Zhou, M. Jaejer, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wodarski v. Kenton County Detention Center Kentucky et al
as 2:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Wodarski
Defendant:
Kenton County Detention Center Kentucky and Deputy Lindel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2019cv00864
Defendant:
Sonya Smith, Chad Lee, Kevin Cobb and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant K Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Authorlee v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2019cv00781
Defendant:
Sonya Smith, Chad Lee, Kevin Cobb and others
Plaintiff:
Marcel Authorlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wodarski v. Kenton County Detention Center Kentucky et al
as 3:2018cv00804
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Wodarski
Defendant:
Kenton County Detention Center Kentucky, Deputy Lindel and Kenton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01151
Defendant:
Sonya Smith, Allen Mulkey and Dana Lee
Plaintiff:
Quentin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dana Andrews v. Howard Forman, et al
as 17-10766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA LEE ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD C. FORMAN, Clerk of Court, Clerk's Office, SCOTT ISREAL, Sheriff, Broward County Sheriff's Office and DEAN REGISTER, Director of F.D.L.E.
Andrews v. Forman et al
as 0:2016cv62294
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Andrews
Defendant:
Howard C. Forman, Scott Isreal and Dean Register
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lee et al
as 3:2016cv01024
Plaintiff:
Paul C Jones
Defendant:
Chad Lee, Chris Fredericks, David Calander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
Carl Price
Defendant:
Sonya Smith, Dana Lee, Chad Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
