Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Dorsey v. Marsh et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Vincent Dorsey
Defendant:
Dr. Marsh, John Wetzel, Sgt. Lefvere and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DEAN v. LITTLE
as 1:2023cv00155
Defendant:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR. and GEORGE M. LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. BROWNING
as 2:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
STAMAR RICHARD MILLER
Defendant:
ESQ. DEAN BROWNING and DEON BROWNING, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WENHOLD v. LYNN et al
as 5:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
JORDAN DEAN WENHOLD
Defendant:
LT. BROOKE LYNN, ALBERT LOANE GAGLIONE, DETECTIVE RICHARD G. HEFFELFINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wenhold v. Smith
as 4:2022cv01873
Plaintiff:
Jordan Dean Wenhold
Defendant:
Correctional Officer H. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2022cv04059
Plaintiff:
CANDIDO YOUNG
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wenhold v. Marsh et al
as 4:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jordan Dean Wenhold
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Marsh, Manager Nelson, Lt. J. Stable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SECHLER v. THOMAS et al
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
ERIC KEVIN SECHLER
Defendant:
DAVID THOMAS and DEAN DURST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
