Cases 1 - 10 of 567
Mack v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Billy Mack
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, FNU Bryd, Lt. FNU Staples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fusilier v. Singletary et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Gregory Fusilier
Defendant:
James P Singletary, Roy West, Zena Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Disciplinary Dept. of TDCJ
as 5:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Disciplinary Dept. of TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newson v. Newson et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Tanzania Newson, Captain Wilcox, Governor of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Mailroom Dept. of TDCJ-ID et al
as 5:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Mailroom Dept. of TDCJ-ID, Directors Review Committee and M.S.C.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verlander v. Aransas County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Adam Wayne Verlander
Defendant:
Aransas County Sheriffs Dept, Sheriff William Mills, Armando Chapa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. NetSpend Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation and Netspend Legal Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Ragsdale et al
as 6:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
John Ragsdale and Texas Dept of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyner v. Unit Grievance Dept.
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Rayland L. Tyner
Defendant:
Unit Grievance Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
