Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Blackstone v. Masters et al
as 1:2013cv22762
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Blackstone
Defendant:
Mr. Masters, F.C.I. McDowell Institution and employees, Karen Hogsten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salazar v. Holder et al
as 3:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Ricky Salazar
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Munoz v. DeBoo et al
as 1:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Roberto Pena Munoz
Defendant:
Kuma DeBoo, Dentist, Director Of Bureau Of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Friedman v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Friedman
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Soria v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Enrique Meza Soria
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin, Eddie Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Nunez Ramos
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin and Kuma J. DeBoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blackcloud v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Blackcloud
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin and Kuma DeBoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramirez v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramirez
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lee v. Holder et al
as 2:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Lee
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Betsy C. Jividen and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sturdevant et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv00142
Plaintiff:
Norbert Sturdevant and Jose Ramirez
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
