Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Grady v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, FNU Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Post Office et al
as 5:2024ct03052
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office and Michael Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2020cv00629
Defendant:
Wake County Family Courts System, John Smith, Robert Rader and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Cooper et al
as 5:2019ct03373
Defendant:
Patrick McCrory, Beverly Purdue, State of North Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deal v. Easley et al
as 5:2018ct03077
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Easley, Beverly Perdue, Pat McCrory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Solomon et al
as 5:2014ct03234
Plaintiff:
Tryphon D. Peacock
Defendant:
George Solomon, NC Department of Public Safety, Sgt. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rippy-Bey et al v. North Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Rippy-Bey and The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes
Defendant:
North Carolina, State of, Roy Cooper, Michael F. Easley and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCORMICK V. SIPE ET AL
as 1:2011cv00416
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW E. MCCORMICK
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. SIPE, PATROLMAN STRICKLAND, CARTER CLENDENIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Sipe et al
as 5:2011ct03014
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. McCormick
Defendant:
Joseph M. Sipe, Patrolman Strickland, Carter Clendenin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS, II v. PRESSLEY et al
as 1:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE L. HARRIS, II
Defendant:
THERESA K. PRESSLEY, CHARLIE HUBBARD, JASON CRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
