Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jeffers v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05139
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jeffers
Defendant:
Wendell J. Garcia, The City of New York, The New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv09159
Plaintiff:
Kamar Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, Corrections Officers John Doe #'s 1-10, Corrections Captain Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dietrich v. Dauphin County et al
as 4:2021cv01465
Plaintiff:
Grace L. Dietrich
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Andrew Klahr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRIOR-RAMIREZ v. WILLIAMS-HALL et al
as 1:2021cv04321
Defendant:
APN STACY WILLIAMS-HALL and JOHN DOE(S) 1-10
Plaintiff:
OSCAR PRIOR-RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STAWARZ v. WEBB et al
as 2:2021cv00195
Defendant:
CO WEBB and JOHN DOE(S) 1-10
Plaintiff:
WALTER STAWARZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SZEMPLE v. CMS et al
as 2:2019cv13414
Defendant:
SANDRA CONOLLOY, UMDNJ/UCHC, JOHN HOCHBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOPKINS v. DICRISTI et al
as 1:2013cv05490
Plaintiff:
SHANE HOPKINS
Defendant:
CASSANDRA DICRISTI, JOSEPH BONDISKEY and JOHN DOE(S) 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURRIS v. FARES SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A. et al
as 3:2011cv00861
Plaintiff:
DONALD A. BURRIS
Defendant:
FARES SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A., DR. LATHAM, DR. SCHMALZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIDIANO v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2010cv04483
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO DIDIANO
Defendant:
KAREN BALICKI , SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON , JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIDIANO v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2010cv01776
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO DIDIANO
Defendant:
KAREN BALICKI, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
