Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jackson v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 3:2023cv30129
Plaintiff:
Marquise Jackson
Defendant:
State of Massachusetts, Dioces of Springfield Church, C&S Wholesale Wharehouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv11557
Defendant:
Orzon Rubio, Bristol County District Attorney's Office, Bristol County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Evans Emons Stroman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Department of Correction
as 4:2021cv40035
Defendant:
Department of Correction
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grannum v. Evangelidis et al
as 4:2018cv40137
Defendant:
Lewis G. Evangelidis, David Tuttle, Lit. M Stone and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eric Grannum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson25 v. Hardrick et al
as 1:2018cv10751
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson25
Defendant:
Timothy Hardrick, William Prize, Jimmy Murkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Decarvalho v. Telford et al
as 1:2017cv11224
Plaintiff:
Janito Decarvalho
Defendant:
Erik Telford, Michael McCarthy, Carlton Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Collecto, Inc.
as 1:2017cv10599
Plaintiff:
Dominique L. Jackson
Defendant:
Collecto Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Remillard v. Worcester County Massachusetts Government et al
as 4:2016cv40149
Plaintiff:
Anthony Remillard
Defendant:
Worcester County Massachusetts Government, Lewis E Evangelivas, Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. GRODOLSKY et al
as 1:2016cv12061
Plaintiff:
Warren Antonio Lee
Defendant:
JEFFREY GRODOLSKY, OWENS, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Jane Doe et al
as 1:2013cv12040
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jackson
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and James J. Saba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
