Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Allan Williams
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Thomas et al
as 5:2013cv01365
Plaintiff:
Rashad C Lee
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, James Deloach, Grant Culliver and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Allen et al
as 4:2009cv02425
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Wright Bey, Sr
Defendant:
Richard Allen, James DeLoach, Gwendolyn Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Steel et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Kelley
Defendant:
Lt. Steel, Richard Allen, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00840
Plaintiff:
Tito T. Davis
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Kathy Holt, Richard Allen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Esco v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00831
Plaintiff:
Tito T. Davis and Billy Dwight Esco
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Kathy Holt, Richard Allen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gay v. DeLoach et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2008cv00561
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant:
James DeLoach and Cathy Holt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Allen et al
as 4:2008cv01151
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Terrance McDonnell, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
