Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foreman v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Renata Foreman
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely, D Mosby, C Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Ms. Cooper et al
as 5:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Martel Robinson
Defendant:
Ms. Cooper, K Cash, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Shaw et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Steven Demote King
Defendant:
Dr. Shaw, Dr. Stone, K. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Bloom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00900
Defendant:
John K. Larkins, III and Beth Bloom
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Al
as 2:2020cv00624
Defendant:
Eta Al, Nurse Greene, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. Town et al
as 2:2019cv01968
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Yvonne Cargill
Defendant:
Elizabeth A. Holt, Melissa K. Atwood, Brett Bloomston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Watson (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00381
Defendant:
Chris Waston, William K. Maddox, Chris Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Mobile County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00206
Plaintiff:
Stevie Alton Reed
Defendant:
Mobile County K-9 Unit, Mobile County Sheriff's Dept. and Sam Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
