Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Boyd v. McMahon et al
as 5:2024ct03053
Plaintiff:
Harold Boyd, Jr
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon, Major Price, Batman Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE and YEDIDIAH SHAKUR-EL
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, MAJOR MOORE, CAPTAIN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berggren v. Gump et al
as 5:2022ct03053
Plaintiff:
Damian Berggren
Defendant:
Officer Gump, Officer Williams, Doug Doughtie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Davidson et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Rusty Anderson
Defendant:
Gene Davidson, 12 or More Grand Jurors, FNU Etters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Pamlico County Government et al
as 5:2021ct03281
Plaintiff:
Melvin David Wetzel, II
Defendant:
Pamlico County Government, Sheriff Chris Davis, Major Arthur Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
SGT. CLARK, MRS. SLADE, DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN and DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITLEY v. WALLACE et al
as 1:2019cv00261
Plaintiff:
MAJOR BOYD WHITLEY
Defendant:
CAPTAIN M. NESBITT, SHERIFF VAN SHAW and LIEUTENANT W. WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Adams et al
as 5:2018ct03026
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Murray
Defendant:
Major Adams and Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Kay et al
as 3:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Cory Lorenzo Walker
Defendant:
Major Kay and Andrew Hyde
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
