Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bell v. Valenza et al
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
James Brazier, Houston County, Alabama, Houston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Christena Denis Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie v. District Court of Walker County Alabama et al
as 6:2020cv00015
Defendant:
District Court of Walker County Alabama and Circuit Court of Walker County Alabama
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neil Guthrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Neil et al
as 2:2016cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Neil, Easterling, Hoover Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coats v. Blakely et al
as 5:2015cv01600
Plaintiff:
Gary Neil Coats
Defendant:
Mike Blakely and Erin Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Park et al
as 2:2014cv02357
Plaintiff:
Charlie J Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Neil Park, Chris Anderson, Phillip Mullens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bankston v. Haddock et al
as 5:2011cv02040
Plaintiff:
Barbara L Hampton Jones Bankston
Defendant:
Steve Haddock, Julie Reynolds, Paul Holland and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coats v. Rich et al
as 5:2011cv01895
Plaintiff:
Gary Neil Coats
Defendant:
Vanessa Rich, Janis Williams, Mike Blakely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Coffee County Sheriff's Department et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv01070
Plaintiff:
Rocky Jones
Defendant:
Coffee County Sheriff's Department, Dave Sutton, Ronnie Whitworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordar v. Morton et al
as 2:2008cv01717
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Cordar
Defendant:
Danny Morton, Wess Neil, R Mack Kent and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reed v. Morton et al
as 2:2008cv01532
Plaintiff:
Roy Joseph William Reed
Defendant:
Danny Morton, Wes Neil, Mack Kent and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
