Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Sivak v. Silverman et al
as 3:2024cv04591
Defendant:
Patrick J. Bumatay, Barry G. Silverman and Gabriel P. Sanchez
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Silverman et al
as 3:2024cv04589
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Patrick J. Bumatay, Barry G. Silverman and Gabriel P. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Silverman et al
as 3:2024cv04590
Defendant:
Barry G. Silverman, Gabriel P. Sanchez and Patrick J. Bumatay
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. UTMB Medical Department
as 3:2018cv00403
Plaintiff:
Joe P Sanchez
Defendant:
UTMB Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis III v. Gibson et al
as 1:2018cv00610
Plaintiff:
Relmon H. Davis, III
Defendant:
J. Vanderpool, Corcoran State Prison Trust Office, F Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armando Aceves v. G. Jaime, et al
as 18-15392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO ABREU ACEVES, AKA Armando Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
G. JAIME, Associate Warden at Kern Valley State Prison, K. HIXON, Captain, GARZA, Counselor and others
Cheney v. Dean et al
as 1:2018cv00196
Plaintiff:
Logan Patrick Cheney
Defendant:
John A. Dean, Michael P. Sanchez and Mark Curnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Simmons v. S. Zamora, et al
as 17-15658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ISAAC SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ZAMORA, DOE, Chief Medical Office Doe, ROBERT KELDGORD and others
Ruben Valdez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 16-16765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, R. S. LAMBERT, Chief Deputy Warden, J. MAHONEY, Psy. D and others
Abreu v. Jaime et al
as 1:2016cv00715
Plaintiff:
Armando Abreu
Defendant:
G. Jaime, K. Hixon, Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
