Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Pratt v. Best et al
as 1:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Public Defender Andrew Best and Richard Mitcham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackie v. Dennis et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Lackie
Defendant:
Dennis, John Putman and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neice v. City of Van Buren, Arkansas
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
City of Van Buren, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neice v. State of Arkansas et al
as 2:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, John or Jane Doe Officers, John or Jane Doe District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rothmeyer v. Buchanon et al
as 4:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Jeremia Lin Rothmeyer
Defendant:
Mickey Buchanon and Richard Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gault et al
as 5:2023cv05170
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Nick Gault and Sergeant Emily Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Gardner et al
as 3:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Richard Lane
Defendant:
Kristy Gardner, BJ Carter and Jack Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Mitcham et al
as 1:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Daniel Todd Mathis
Defendant:
Captain Richard Mitcham, Casie Sanford, Harley West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLeod v. Mitcham
as 1:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. McLeod
Defendant:
Captain Richard Mitcham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Phillips et al
as 4:2022cv00583
Plaintiff:
Richard Hyatt
Defendant:
Grisham A Phillips, Chris Walton, Rebecca Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
