Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Whyte-Cohen v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv12609
Plaintiff:
Dequann Whyte-Cohen
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Corrections, MR Christopher Braley, Joshua Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez Cruz v. Bristol Superior Court et al
as 4:2022cv40103
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez Cruz
Defendant:
Bristol Superior Court, Thomas Quinn, C.P.E.S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Burdzy et al
as 1:2022cv12207
Plaintiff:
Elijah J Rodriguez
Defendant:
Mark Burdzy, Kevin S Clonan, J Peppoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. SSA, Salem, MA
as 1:2022cv12069
Plaintiff:
Juan Hector Rodriguez
Defendant:
SSA, Salem, MA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez Cruz v. Bristol Superior Court et al
as 1:2022cv10581
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez Cruz
Defendant:
Bristol Superior Court, C.P.C.S, Javier Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez v. Bristol Superior Court et al
as 1:2021cv11819
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez
Defendant:
Bristol Superior Court, C.P.C.S, Frances E Viera Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. Woloshky et al
as 1:2021cv11291
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez
Defendant:
Kristen Woloshky, Bristol County Sheriff's, Frances E Viera Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Mici et al
as 1:2020cv12292
Plaintiff:
Saladin Fard Allah
Defendant:
Michael Rodriguez and Carol Mici
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Micci
as 1:2021cv10126
Defendant:
Carol A Micci
Plaintiff:
Elijah Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnham v Grandade, et al
as 4:2019cv40091
Defendant:
Officer Grandade and Officer Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
