Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Giagnacovo v. Romero et al
as 4:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Hector Damian Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Romero, Sanchez, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giagnacovo v. Romero et al
as 4:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Hector Damian Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Romero, Sanchez, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Soliz et al
as 5:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Pedro Espinoza, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Soliz, Lieutenant D. Romero and Susie Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Adams et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Franklin Smith
Defendant:
FNU Adams, Vincent Romero and FNU LNU 5:23-CV-134-C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Davis et al
as 5:2022cv01368
Plaintiff:
Richard Roy Romero
Defendant:
Warden Bernie Davis, SGT. Samantha Mendez, Co. III Genisis Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flanagan v. Romero
as 4:2022cv04370
Plaintiff:
Theodore Flanagan
Defendant:
Mrs. Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snellings v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ray Snellings
Defendant:
United States of America, Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Securityi Threat Group Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snellings v. Espinoza et al
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ray Snellings
Defendant:
C Espinoza, Joseph R Biden, Jr, J Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Togo et al
as 6:2021cv01070
Plaintiff:
Saul A. Romero
Defendant:
P.A. Milton Togo, Medical Director Teri Smith and Dr. Douglas Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Stewart et al
as 2:2021cv00172
Plaintiff:
Miguel Romero, Michael Romero and Mike Romero
Defendant:
Paul Stewart and Mark Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
