Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rose v. Stirling
as 0:2023cv05261
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. Jefferson
as 2:2023cv02132
Plaintiff:
James Edward Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Deadra L. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
as 2:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. Berkeley County Sheriff Department
as 2:2022cv00886
Plaintiff:
James Edward Rose, Jr
Defendant:
Berkeley County Sheriff Department, Berkeley County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff Duane Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. State of South Carolina et al
as 2:2021cv02909
Plaintiff:
James Edward Rose, Jr
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Hill-Finklea Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kraim Wilson v. Richland County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv02912
Plaintiff:
Indigo Ocean Rose Kraim Wilson
Defendant:
The State, Richland Springs, Mayor Steve Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rose v. Stirling et al
as 0:2020cv01158
Defendant:
Anthony Burton, Bryan Stirling and Bryan Sterling
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2018cv03315
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2017cv01958
Plaintiff:
Clark D Thomas and George K Nichols
Defendant:
Folly Beach, City of, Nathan S Williams, James W Smiley, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Walters et al
as 8:2015cv02179
Plaintiff:
James M Howard
Defendant:
Walters, Mr Rose and Dana Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
