Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Watts v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Michael Watts
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, J. Quick, C. Jourdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Ross
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Kate Brown, Tina Kotek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbess v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Steven Charles Forbess
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Warren Roberts, Dr. Garth Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv01090
Defendant:
S. Johnston, C. Digiulio, Dr. Vriesman and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Duncan
as 3:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnston and Michael S Johnston
Defendant:
Kassy Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Hunter et al
as 3:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Kassy Duncan, Jordan Moss, Tim Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnston and Michael S Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ruiz v. Johnston et al
as 2:2019cv02423
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, D. Caraballo and S. Johnston
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh v. Gruenwald et al
as 2:2017cv00829
Defendant:
J. Dafoe, C. Dieter, S. Franke and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Stancliff et al
as 1:2017cv00589
Defendant:
C. Bolles, S. Brown, E. Bucher and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. Nichols et al
as 2:2016cv01957
Defendant:
C. Dieter, Steve Franke, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
