Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Abram v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01821
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Alonzo et al v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alonzo, Jaun Frausto, Bairo Cardona Perez and others
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Samuel Abram v. David Leu, et al
as 22-10019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL ROY ABRAM
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LEU, Captain of Security, A. CLUNTZ, SIS Agent and K. BARKER, SIS Lieutenant
Abram v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv00415
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant:
USA, A Boteler and Andrew Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. Mnuchin et al
as 8:2018cv00752
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant:
Steven Mnuchin, Larry Hogan and Internal Revenue Service Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Abram v. David Leu, et al
as 17-12319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ROY ABRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LEU, Captain of Security, A. CLUNTZ, SIS Agent and K. BARKER, SIS Lieutenant
Abram v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abram v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01317
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00458
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abram v. Melton
as 1:2016cv00878
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant:
C Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
