Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Collins v. Amjad et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Clayton Steven Collins
Defendant:
Dr. Ayne Amjad, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens et al v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Stevens and Nicholas VanBuren
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Beth Waugh, Dustyn Isner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Mnuchin
as 1:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Josh Chapman
Respondent:
Steven Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Skaggs v. Hoke et al
as 2:2023cv00759
Petitioner:
Shelby Dean Skaggs
Respondent:
Jay M. Hoke, Victor Navy, T. M. Divita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doman v. Mnuchin
as 1:2023cv00480
Petitioner:
Levi Doman
Respondent:
Steven Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Anthony Steven Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Hazelton chaplain and USP Hazelton Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Anthony Steven Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Hazelton Warden and DSCC Grand Prairie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Secatello v. Hemstreet et al
as 5:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Vincent Todd Secatello, Jr.
Defendant:
SGT Steven Hemstreet, CPL Coseek, CAPT Codden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurt v. Tate
as 5:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Hurt
Defendant:
D. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
