Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Clark v. Hill County Jail
as 4:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric James Clark
Defendant:
Hill County Jail, Sandy Lynn Cook, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone et al v. The City of Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Maxzine Byrd and others
Defendant:
The City of Dallas County Texas, Jim Bowles, Police Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coalwell v. Gately
as 6:2021cv00485
Plaintiff:
Scott Eldred Coalwell
Defendant:
Sandy S. Gately
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 6:2020cv00262
Defendant:
Warden Donna Kazmierczak, Asst. Warden Karen Stroleny, Robert N. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Yvette Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coltart v. State of Texas, et al
as 6:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Thu Le, Olsson LNU, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Scott Coltart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallings v. Beavers et al
as 3:2019cv01839
Plaintiff:
Robert E Stallings, Sr
Defendant:
Mr NFN Compton, Ms Sandy NLN and Mr NFN Beavers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baladez v. Patterson et al
as 1:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
Sandro Baladez
Defendant:
P Patterson, Laura Midkiff, Daniel Gideon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foxworth v. Thaler et al
as 6:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Sandy Foxworth
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Griffin, FNU Lewis, Warden Melodye Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Ginsel et al
as 9:2011cv00115
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
Cody Ginsel, G. Currie, S Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Murray et al
as 9:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Sandy Dickerson
Defendant:
Allen G. Zond, D.O., Guillermo Porras, M.D. and Wallace Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
