Cases 1 - 10 of 27
GAUSE v. GEOFF et al
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
WALTER T. GAUSE
Defendant:
GREGORY GEOFF, FNU - SHAW, MORRISON LEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, TODD ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01024
Plaintiff:
DA'QUAHN A. ROBERTS
Defendant:
MARCUS SCOTT, VALRIS JERNIGAN, FNU WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. MCDOWELL
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, P.R.E.A. CORRDINATOR MS. COVINGTON, CHIEF AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNELL v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE CONNELL, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN ADAMS and SHERIFF VAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVINGTON v. MARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
AMANDA MARRIS, KENDRA BLINN MONTGOMERY, ORLANDO F. HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SHAW et al
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. JACKSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF VAN SHAW, SGT. MATHEW PARIS, JOHN LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creech v. McVicker et al
as 5:2022ct03113
Plaintiff:
Eric Creech
Defendant:
Sheriff McVicker, Captain Shaw, A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
