Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Otvos v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Randall Otvos
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, County of Wilkes, Landen James-Dean Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COCHRAN v. MADDOX
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
KHALID COCHRAN
Defendant:
TOM MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. United States Supreme Court et al
as 5:2021ct03148
Defendant:
Hon. William Matthewman, United States District Court "Miami", United States Courthouse "Judicial" and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TYLER v. FERGUSON et al
as 1:2021cv00363
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FRYE, DANNY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Thompson et al
as 5:2018ct03336
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Clark, II
Defendant:
Dean Locklear, Caroline Riddick-Taylor, Horner M. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Harwood et al
as 1:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Brian David Arnold
Defendant:
Buddy Harwood, Francie Denton and Tom Banks
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Harwood et al
as 1:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Eric Wayne Moss
Defendant:
Buddy Harwood, Francy Dention and Tom Banks
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. BARCELLONA et al
as 1:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant:
TOM BARCELLONA, ANDREW P. CLEMENT, WILLIAMS W. BAGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNBAR v. MUNICIPALITY/CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM et al
as 1:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEONARD DUNBAR
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY/CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, COUNTY OF FORSYTH, WALTER MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Rominger et al
as 5:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Johnson
Defendant:
Dee Dee Rominger, Jaska H. Rominger, Len D. Hagaman and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
