Cases 1 - 10 of 3,442
Ellis v. Does
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Does Mark/Scott, Owners, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Ty, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Employee, Loose Change Coin Laundry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Prince
as 6:2024cv06070
Plaintiff:
Henry Darnell Turner
Defendant:
Brandy Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Philhours et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Owen Watson
Defendant:
Randy Philhours and Mike Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seadorf v. Damante et al
as 2:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
Arthur William Seadorf, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim Damante, Officer Jonathan Stroud and Booking Officer Reed Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Fowler et al
as 4:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Derrick Russell
Defendant:
Lea Ellen Fowler, Ola B Lackey, Eric S Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poindexter v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie A Poindexter
Defendant:
Kim M Smith, Cristi R Beaumont, John C Threet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkpatrick v. Does
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Skyler Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Roberts
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Darius Santwann Dixon
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officers, Eureka Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. Benton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2024cv05064
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Benton County Sheriff's Office, Benton County Detention Center, Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
