Cases 101 - 110 of 111
Kyle Longacre v. Rick Snyder, et al
as 12-2110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYLE JOSEPH LONGACRE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK SNYDER, Governor, State of Michigan, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director, UNKNOWN CURLEY, Warden and others
Curtis Fuller v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 12-2025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS FULLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS
Mundy #577210 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Mundy #577210
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Osceola County Jail, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longacre #626648 v. Snyder et al
as 2:2012cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kyle Joseph Longacre #626648
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns, Unknown Curley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller et al v. Heyns
as 2:2012cv12371
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller, Felicia Dyer, Ursula Heard and others
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Patricia Caruso, Sean Lockhart and others
Clark #183908 v. Dessellier et al
as 2:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
Michael Belike Clark #183908
Defendant:
J. Dessellier, Jeff Larson, E. Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sexton #156238 v. Curley et al
as 2:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Sexton #156238
Defendant:
Michael W. Curley, Daniel H. Heyns, Kim Corcoran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longacre #626648 v. Snyder et al
as 2:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kyle Joseph Longacre #626648
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns, Unknown Curley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers #303106 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2011cv01121
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Rogers #303106
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, Daniel H. Heyns, Mary Berghuis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #212103 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2011cv00875
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith #212103
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Patricia Schmidt and Cheryl Reincke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
