Cases 101 - 110 of 148
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
MELVIN DAVIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BRUCE HERDMAN, CORRECTIONS OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERNARD v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BERNARD
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DANIEL GEHLMANN, JOHN/JANE DOES NUMBER 1 TO 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00627
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. WALKER, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, KEVIN KAUFFMAN, DIANE KAGARISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHINE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA et al
as 2:2015cv02354
Plaintiff:
BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DASILVA v. DETENTION CENTER COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2015cv02150
Plaintiff:
PEDRO MIGUEL PINHO DASILVA
Defendant:
DETENTION CENTER COUNTY JAIL, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEPPIEN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEPPIEN
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC. , ANNETTE KOWALESKI , HANS REISINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, JOHN DOE # 1, JOHN DOE # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QADR v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
NUR QADR
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, GEORGE MCQUOWN, D.F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, KENNETH CAMERON, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
