Cases 101 - 110 of 144
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 6:2013cv00533
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
R B Harwell, K F McDonald, US Postal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gaither v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L Gaither
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
McGhee Charles v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv02542
Plaintiff:
McGhee Charles
Defendant:
United States of America, M L Rivera, Bob Durant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv02149
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cruz
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, Lt Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vance v. Holder et al
as 6:2011cv03460
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Vance
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, Harold Lappin, John Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv03128
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne McDaniels
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sifford v. United States of America
as 8:2011cv03019
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Sifford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pendergrass v. United States of America et al
as 0:2011cv02706
Plaintiff:
Jerome Pendergrass
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and FNU Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv01612
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jermaine Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States District Court, Edward D JR Barnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. United States of America
as 5:2011cv00953
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Gaither
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
