Cases 11 - 20 of 164
Homer v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
Michael Homer
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, M.D. and Robert Morton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coward v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Rodney Coward
Defendant:
Physician John or Jane Doe and Superintendent Robert Morton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2022cv50010
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Defendant:
A. Ciolli and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morton v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2022cv50011
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Food Service Department and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pryor v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Daivon Pryor
Defendant:
Physician John or Jane Doe, M.D. and Superintendent Robert Morton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50480
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Rivers, Ms. Rainmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morton v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50470
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Defendant:
A. Ciolli and Dr. Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morton v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv05463
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Morton
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Superintendent Iracheta, Officer F. Amato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50373
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Morton
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, C. Rivers, Ms. Rainmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2021cv01094
Plaintiff:
CARL S. JONES, JR., ANTHONY LEE, CHARLES LANTZY and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER
Petitioner:
CODY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
