Cases 11 - 20 of 431
SMITH v. ALABI et al
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
CADEN LEE SMITH
Defendant:
G. ALABI and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALLEN BALL
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, BARBARA RIGGS and JANE OR JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERBERT v. SKINNER et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Chance Herbert
Defendant:
TONY SKINNER, OFFICER FOX, OFFICER KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
LANA W. WALTERS and LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
T. BELLO, SALAJA, DEPUTY U and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, FEMI, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, F. EMI and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSH v. HENDRICKS COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH MARSH
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY, INDIANA and JOHN DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. STORM et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
STORM, JENNIFER FRENCH, R. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROY CROSBY
Defendant:
J. KALLIS, OFFICER JANE DOE, SAJNAJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
