Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Jackson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00561
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Kay Ivey and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Bullock Medical Department, Warden McClain, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Babers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00198
Plaintiff:
Chez D. Rice
Defendant:
Captain McCovery and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Gay et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Brian Wilson, Gwendolyn Babers, Eleval Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Holcey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00021
Defendant:
A. McClain, J. Ellis, B. McCorvey and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Mr. Boyd, Mary Collins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care, Captain Lamar and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Warden McClain, Wexford Health Care, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Consolidated Defendant:
Mary Collins, Mr. Turner, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00959
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Bullock v. Warden, et al
as 18-10962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE BULLOCK, a.k.a. Maurice Terrance Bullock
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, GWENDOLYN BABERS, Capt., EDWARD KERN, Dr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
