Prison Condition Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 75
KING v. TOSSONE
as 5:2019cv02320
Defendant: SGT. TOSSONE
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING et al v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM SUPERVISOR OFFICIALS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00389
Defendant: WARDEN QUIGLEY, KEVIN S. BARNHARDT, BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM SUPERVISOR OFFICIALS and others
Plaintiff: DEDEON GREEN, CHARLES BETHEH, JERRY LEE WOMACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. SAMUELS et al
as 5:2019cv00200
Defendant: SGT. BRANDIT and NICOLE D. SAMUELS
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. QUIGLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv05312
Defendant: WARDEN J. QUIGLEY, DEPUTY WARDEN SMITH, ICC JESSICA COLLINS and others
Plaintiff: DERRICK KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. GONZLAS
as 5:2018cv05172
Defendant: GONZLAS
Plaintiff: DERRICK KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. VANBILLIARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv03962
Defendant: BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM, OFFICER STEPHEN DEW, DANIEL VANBILLIARD and others
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. SMITH et al
as 3:2018cv00175
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and CRAIG PETTULLA
Plaintiff: SHAWN KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KING v. QUIGELY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv03420
Defendant: C/O KIESER, WARDEN J. QUIGELY, C/O MATTHEW LUPPOLD and others
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLMAN v. BEVERLY et al
as 5:2018cv03413
Plaintiff: BRIAN ELLMAN
Defendant: MR. BEVERLY, MISS CINTRON, MR. HUMBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2018cv02758
Defendant: WARDEN QUIGLEY, CAPTAIN CASTRO, SGT TOSSONE and others
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?