Cases 11 - 20 of 49
McCormick v. Sasser et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Robert McCormick
Defendant:
Sgt. Sasser, Sgt. Crossley, Lt. Clemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Bruton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Mark Bruton, Angie Baggett, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00468
Plaintiff:
Theophlis R. Ervin
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Charles McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oden v. Thomas et al(INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Oden
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Leeposey Daniels, Charles McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
Aricke Alexander Taylor
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Leon Bolling, Lt. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Daniels et al
as 2:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Durwin C. Boyd
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels , Sergeant Watson , Lieutenant Brumley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clegg v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Clegg
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Grant Culliver, Dewayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oden v. Thomas et al
as 2:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Oden
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Leeposey Daniels and Charles McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Daniels (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Elgin M. Brown
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snell v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01075
Plaintiff:
Ronald Clyde Snell
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Charles McKee, Althea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
