Cases 11 - 20 of 297
Wallace v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Wallace
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
DiAngelo K. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Walker v. Unites States Penitentiary Coleman #2 et al
as 5:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Walker
Defendant:
Unites States Penitentiary Coleman #2, FNU Swain, FNU Summerfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Young v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Tramell Deon Young
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cook v. Warden
as 6:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Cook
Defendant:
USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morel v. Pearce et al
as 7:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Kevin Pearce, James Adams, Nathan Tussey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Christopher James Davila
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McLaughlin v. USP Big Sandy et al
as 7:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brooke Aaron McLaughlin
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Agent Parr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Swint v. United States Penitentiary at Allenwood
as 1:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL SWINT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY AT ALLENWOOD, Warden at USP Allenwood, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
