Cases 11 - 20 of 104
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 2:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, OFFICER JOHN DOE, DESK SERGEANT JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLS v. E. JUDDUE et al
as 2:2023cv03157
Plaintiff:
RONELL NICHOLS
Defendant:
E. JUDDUE, O. DWOMOH, S. DAVIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv03036
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, DR. G, SUPERINTENDENT J. TERRA and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE D. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
DAVON JONES and CORDELL YOUNG
Defendant:
SERGEANT WALTERS and SERGEANT HEIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG, et al. v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
CORDELL YOUNG and DAVON JONES
Defendant:
SERGEANT WALTERS and SERGEANT HEIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, George Little, Secretary of Department of Corrections, TABE BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. SCI Dallas, et al
as 3:2023cv00214
In Re:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
M. Sopata, A. A. Smith, D. Mull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. HALLMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant:
KIP HALLMAN, PAUL NOEL, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. GARNETTE et al
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
ADAM JOSEPH BROWN
Defendant:
D GARNETTE, B HUNER, ROSEMARIE JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
