Cases 11 - 20 of 118
Briggs v. Bright et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe and Kevin Briggs
Defendant:
Carolynn Bright and Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Allen Roe Williams
Defendant:
Bernice Young, Diana .., Peoria County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Hoffman et al
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
C Hoffman, Carmisha Turner, . Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazelton v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01324
Plaintiff:
Rodney Brazelton
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Chris Watkins, Susan Brobston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Douglas County et al
as 2:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
Douglas E Duncan
Defendant:
Douglas County Illinois, Nate Chaplin, Skyler Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burt-Brazziel v. Glaze et al
as 2:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Howard Elwon Burt-Brazziel
Defendant:
Glaze, Simmons, Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Asbell et al
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
Brian Asbell, Hoffman, . Trisha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynn v. Huibregtse et al
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Darryl Allen Flynn
Defendant:
Charles Huibregtse, Nathan Tapio, Mary Gorske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Guyton et al
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
Qwanell S Jones
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, . Jones, Angel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Gorsi et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Corey Brooks
Defendant:
Shamaila Gorsi, Jana Huston, Carrie Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
