Cases 11 - 20 of 7,631
LOPEZ v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
MARTIN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CASEY JACOBS-CAMPBELL and MIKAYLA WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAGE v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LOUIS SAGE
Defendant:
CRAWFORD, STROSNIDER, VAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. ASHONG et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY DIANE BAKER
Defendant:
HELENA ASHONG, HOPE DE KREF, KATHY NICHOLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRENTON v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL BRENTON
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Hegg et al
as 3:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Lavara Blanchard
Defendant:
Ron Hegg and A Hahn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLLIVER v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
THEOTIS D. TOLLIVER
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, DUAN PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARON-STOREY v. BYRD
as 1:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
ANSHIOUS B.D. ARON-STOREY
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GHOLSTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHOLSTON
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, JAEKAR TEAH and CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
