Cases 11 - 20 of 10,890
TAYLOR v. CO 1 DUNSTON et al
as 2:2024cv02424
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant:
CO 1 DUNSTON and THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIOTT v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv02426
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ELLIOTT
Defendant:
RANITA DAVIS, KIM DAVIS, MICHAEL SEADOG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TERRELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIELS, WALSTON and SURGI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. LETIZIO et al
as 2:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR LETIZIO, E. CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
CAMPBELL
as 5:2024cv02381
Not Yet Classified:
DIMITRIUS BASNIR CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Boose et al
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Raheem Johnson
Defendant:
Boose, CAPTAIN Baptiste, GRIEVANCE COUNSELOR Heist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, ANTHONY TILLMAN, MICHAEL FIGUEROA and others
Defendant:
LAUREL R. HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, S. SHAFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON et al v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
MALIKA HENDERSON, KHALIL HAMMOND, DAVID THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER et al v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv02295
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE WALKER and KHALIL HAMMOND
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
