Cases 11 - 20 of 8,230
Coleman v. Onuoha et al
as 9:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
Stye L. Coleman
Defendant:
Dr. Onuoha and Ms. Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linder v. Tolson et al
as 9:2024cv03159
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wayne Linder
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John G. Hicks, Sgt. Ratchford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nance v. Reynolds et al
as 8:2024cv03142
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nance
Defendant:
Don Reynolds, Randall Sammons, Steven Wix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jones v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Quarmaine Marquise Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Singletary v. Stirling et al
as 9:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A. Singletary
Defendant:
Brian P. Stirling, Jana Hollis, Stephen Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Lt. Chandler et al
as 0:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
David Tyran Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Chandler, Sgt. Calex, SCDC Security Threat Group Intelligence Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
King v. Lieber Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Eugene King
Defendant:
Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lynch v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv03010
Plaintiff:
James Lynch, III and Ras J. Ammi Tafari
Defendant:
Stacy Smith, Bonnie Degraffenried and Karen Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goss v. Stonebreaker
as 2:2024cv03138
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Goss
Defendant:
Donnie E. Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johns v. Lauferdie
as 6:2024cv02974
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sanders Johns
Defendant:
FNU Lauferdie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
