Cases 21 - 30 of 39
BRAY v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00464
Plaintiff:
KASHMIR L. BRAY
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, JAMIE HOUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAIN et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00440
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAIN and JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADAMS v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS ADAMS
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT and MAX GAW
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Defendant:
COMM J. DAVID DONAHUE, MICHAEL OSBURN and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADAMS v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00137
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS ADAMS
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, ED BUSS, C. WHELAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DITSWORTH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARL DITSWORTH
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, COMM J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. CIRKRIT et al
as 1:2007cv01544
Plaintiff:
OTIS L. THOMAS
Defendant:
STAFF SURGEON, DR. CIRKRIT, RESIDENT DR. KERR, MEDICAL DIRECTOR, ELTON AMOS, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batchelder v. Donahue et al
as 2:2007cv00313
Plaintiff:
Vonzell Batchelder
Defendant:
David Donahue, Cecil K Davis and John J Widup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2007cv00805
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PARKS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, MITCH E. DANIELS, JR., STEVE CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv00674
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL COBB, SR.
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, STEVE JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
