Cases 21 - 30 of 51
MARTIN v. COOPER AND FREEMAN LAW FIRM et al
as 4:2018cv00196
Defendant:
COOPER AND FREEMAN LAW FIRM, INDIANA STATE POLICE and ASHLEY URBAN LAW FIRM
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. STATE OF INDIANA POLICE et al
as 4:2018cv00140
Defendant:
COOPER AND FREEMAN, ASHLEY ARBIN, STATE OF INDIANA POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLEN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANLEY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv02254
Defendant:
KRUL, A. PETTY, J. DENNEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. FOSTER et al
as 4:2018cv00032
Defendant:
JOEY BARRIS, JAUSH CLARK, DERICK FOSTER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYMAN D. THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANKH EL v. RAY SKILLMAN WESTSIDE IMPORTS INC et al
as 2:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL
Defendant:
VINCE FREEMAN, CHRISTOPHER MUHNEY and RAY SKILLMAN WESTSIDE IMPORTS INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. IDOC et al
as 1:2015cv00532
Defendant:
DAVID BARR, IDOC, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. BURDINE
as 1:2014cv01236
Defendant:
BURDINE
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2014cv01047
Defendant:
BRAD FREEMAN and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Plaintiff:
GARY MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAGHON v. STORMS et al
as 2:2014cv00192
Defendant:
BUTTS, COLLINS, L. FREEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN TAGHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. WARREN et al
as 1:2013cv00869
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Defendant:
RANDALL P. GENTRY, TIM A. GROGG, THOR R. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
