Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Stanley Hall v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 09-16161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff, Custodian, 3RD SHIFT OFFICER, #B636, Detention Officer 4-F-2 Pod Close Custody, JOHN DOE, Detention Officer #1 and others
Jerrod Booth v. Inmate Legal Services, et al
as 09-15787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH, AKA Jerrod Booth
Defendant - Appellee:
INMATE LEGAL SERVICES, JOE ARPAIO, TIMOTHY OVERTON and others
Booth v. Inmate Legal Services, et al
as 2:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B. B. Booth
Defendant:
Inmate Legal Services, Joe Arpaio, Timothy Overton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bohl v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Bohl
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Legal Services and Joe Arpaio
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Arpaio, et al
as 2:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Stanley Hall
Defendant:
Joseph Arpaio, 3rd Shift Officer, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Booth v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv01494
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len Booth
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Booth v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv00668
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len Booth
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, James Garitson, Inmate Legal Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero et al v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2007cv00909
Plaintiff:
Davis Michael Romero, Steven Defillipi, Ricky Evans and others
Defendant:
Joseph M. Arpaio, Inmate Legal Services and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2007cv00641
Plaintiff:
Laura Ann Rogers
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M. Arpaio, Cesolini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
