Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Davis v. Garnett et al
as 2:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
William S. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
James Garnett, Donald Hunter, Piedmont Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders-El et al v. Hehenberger et al
as 1:2017cv00879
Plaintiff:
Antonio J Saunders-El
Defendant:
John Doe , Jane and/or John Doe, John Doe Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 2:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Wendy K. Brown, Ms. E. Locust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Garnett et al
as 2:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis
Defendant:
Jome Garnett, Donnell Honler, Major Agnew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Hunter et al
as 1:2016cv01245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Donald Hunter, Wade Bartlett, Lorita Dodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yaconis v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
Phillip David Yaconis
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Incorporated, Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Jones et al
as 2:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Keon Madden
Defendant:
LT. Jones, Adcock, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Palmer, et al
as 2:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kevin Combs
Defendant:
(John Doe) "Palmer, Captain (John Doe) "Norris, 1-14 John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barriera v. VA Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00380
Plaintiff:
Alberto Vincent Barriera
Defendant:
VA Department of Corrections, St. Bride's Correctional Facility, Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Waters et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Waters
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Incorporated, Ed Wright, Daniel Calhoun, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
