Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Foote v. Lolli et al
as 3:2013cv50349
Plaintiff:
Darrion O. Foote
Defendant:
Mark Lolli, Eric Meath, Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdus-Shahid Ali v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-2581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Former Director, Bureau of Prisons, Juan D. Castillo, Warden, USMCFP and others
Dear v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv04488
Plaintiff:
Demiskic Dear
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulghum v. Allen et al
as 6:2013cv03248
Plaintiff:
John Fulghum
Defendant:
J Allen, Lee, Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv03558
Plaintiff:
William Sanchez
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Brown, Galan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Diggs v. Sheriff Jim Arnott, et al
as 13-1632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert O. Diggs
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Jim Arnott, Administrator Tim Smith, Harold Bengsch and others
Shoemaker v. Merritt et al
as 6:2013cv03115
Plaintiff:
Walter C. Shoemaker
Defendant:
Wayne Merritt, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Nixon et al
as 5:2013cv06022
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, George Lombardi, MO Board of Probation & Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2012cv04325
Plaintiff:
Gary Randolph
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Douglas Prudden, John I Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holly v. Corwin et al
as 4:2012cv01432
Plaintiff:
Rodrick D. Holly
Defendant:
James Corwin, John I Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
