Cases 21 - 30 of 40
WILLIAMS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PAUL ENNIS, EARL JONES, ALEXIS SECARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PETTAWAY v. WOLF et al
as 1:2018cv00306
Defendant:
HEARING EXAMINER SZELEWSLI, SGT. MACKINTOSH, BRYAN E. FLINCHBAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PETTAWAY v. KENNY et al
as 1:2018cv00288
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK and CHERYL KENNY
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WESTERFIELD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
RONNY J. WESTERFIELD
Defendant:
ALEXIS SACARA, MICHAEL CLARK, DOCTOR JOSE BOGGIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PETTAWAY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01229
Defendant:
PAULA ENNIS, MICHAEL CLARK, CSO BRIAN E. FLINCHBAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PETTAWAY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00283
Defendant:
PAULA ENNIS, MICHAEL CLARK, CSO BRIAN E. FLINCHBAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BERRIOZ v. BELL et al
as 1:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BERRIOZ
Defendant:
J. BELL, JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLOSS v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ANTHONY KLOSS
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC, JACKIE HESTER, MARCY DUDDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MICKENS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICKENS, SR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, JERI SMOCK, CHCA, MICHAEL EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DARREN MILLER and DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYBETH ANDERSON, MAX GOTTESMAN, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
