Cases 21 - 30 of 40
HARRIS v. POSKA et al
as 2:2015cv01493
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
POSKA, C. PARKER, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLEMAGNE v. SUPERINTENDENT TREVOR WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
HAGGAI CHARLEMAGNE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TREVOR WINGARD, C/O KEYSER, UNIT MANAGER ONSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICASTRO v. RITCHEY et al
as 3:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. NICASTRO
Defendant:
P. JOEL RITCHEY, LORRIE EARNESTY, YLETTA CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WANAMAKER v. THE DEPT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
DARREN LYONEL WANAMAKER
Defendant:
THE DEPT OF CORRECTION, KIMBERLY BARKELY, SANDRA A. KOZLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ULLI KLEMM, FAITH AKDEMIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
YUMIL PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM, REV. PHIL MAUST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYCE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYCE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TREVOR WINGARD, ALLEN JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WANAMAKER v. THE DEPT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2015cv02627
Plaintiff:
DARREN LYONEL WANAMAKER
Defendant:
THE DEPT OF CORRECTION, KIMBERLY BARKELY, SANDRA A. KOZLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. HYDE et al
as 3:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
BRIAN HYDE, TREVOR WINGARD, HEIDI SROKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. THOMAS
Defendant:
TREVOR WINGARD, JOHN WETZEL and DANIEL MEUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
