Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Michael Gresham v. Willie Smith, et al
as 12-1703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE O. SMITH, Warden, et al. and D. KELLY, ARUS
Fuller et al v. Heyns
as 2:2012cv12371
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller, Felicia Dyer, Ursula Heard and others
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Patricia Caruso, Sean Lockhart and others
Michael Gresham v. Willie Smith, et al
as 12-1574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE O. SMITH, Warden, et al. and D. KELLY, ARUS
Michael Gresham v. Willie Smith, et al
as 12-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE O. SMITH, Warden, et al.
Gresham #272603 et al v. Mutschler et al
as 2:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603 and Ralph Proctor #297924
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Mutschler, P. Johns, Kristi Kangas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Langford v. Willie Smith, et al
as 11-2585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. LANGFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE O. SMITH, Warden, N. NORWOOD and ERICA HUSS
Evans #367619 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
Alrelio Evans #367619
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, Kenneth McGinnis, Mike Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Schuh v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY DANIEL SCHUH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, STEPHEN H. MARSCHKE, Internal Affairs Manager of M.D.O.C. and others
Sanders #305405 v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00892
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders #305405
Defendant:
Willie O. Smith, Nannett Norwood, Erica Huss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller #211080 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller #211080
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dennis M. Straub, Sean Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
