Cases 21 - 30 of 7,787
HOOD v. GASKIN et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Defendant:
RICHARD GASKIN and DEZARAY WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. HOCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
HOCKEY, MARTIN, A. TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. PARKER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant:
ARAMARK, FOX, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC and JASON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RAY YOUNG
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL and BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERRIFFS DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00978
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant:
WELLPATH, AKANBI and KERRY J. FORRESTAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRYE v. SCHNELL
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
SAVION KAIN FRYE
Defendant:
RANDY SCHNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAPETANIOS v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL KAPETANIOS, SR.
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL and BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERRIFFS DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACKALL v. BELL et al
as 2:2024cv00296
Defendant:
RICHARD STUART JOSEPH, KATHERINE SWEENLEY BELL, KATHRYN STUART and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MACKALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
