Cases 31 - 40 of 50
ABNER v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ABNER, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUCKER v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00087
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
VINCENT LEONARD RUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MEREDITH v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00088
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
KEITH JOEL MEREDITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MALOY v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00091
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DILLON v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00090
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
JONATHON DILLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HESS v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00089
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. HESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILSON v. ROTHENBURG et al
as 2:2016cv00147
Defendant:
CILLOABACHIE, COLLWAY, DANIEL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. MORRIS et al
as 4:2014cv00102
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, D. MORRIS and R. VEST
Plaintiff:
DONALD BRUCE ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STINE v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2013cv00431
Defendant:
DONALD DENNEY, MAJOR JOHN DOE, MORRIS LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PINSON et al v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2013cv00428
Defendant:
DONALD DENNEY, JOHN DOE, MORRIS LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PINSON and MIKEAL STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
