Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Hamilton v. Tyler et al
as 5:2010cv01436
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamilton
Defendant:
Debra Tyler, Marie Scherer, L. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmona v. Grannis et al
as 5:2010cv00498
Plaintiff:
Luis Carmona
Defendant:
N. Grannis, R. Pimentel, M. Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBose v. Ayers et al
as 5:2009cv05998
Plaintiff:
Donald R. DeBose, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, P. Crerar, D. Sellhan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Bratton v. Ben Curry, et al
as 09-17820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BRATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, W. MARTINUS, Correctional Officer, B. R. PEOPLES and others
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
GREG SHEFFIELD
Perkins v. Chrones et al
as 4:2009cv05855
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Donell Perkins
Defendant:
L. Chrones, Robert Horel, Francisco Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Horel et al
as 3:2009cv05314
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Williams
Defendant:
Robert A. Horel, M. A. Cook, Dayton N. Conover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yelenich et al v. Cate et al
as 4:2009cv05073
Plaintiff:
Scott Louis Yelenich
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Coleen Noll, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Hippo et al
as 4:2009cv04477
Plaintiff:
Horace A. Bell
Defendant:
G. Hippo, T. Kurtz, A. Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Hedgepath et al
as 4:2009cv04358
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Ahmed Wright
Defendant:
A. Hedgepath, G. D. Lewis, M. Moore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonty v. Neotti et al
as 4:2009cv04079
Plaintiff:
Miles O. Bonty
Defendant:
G. A. Neotti, J. Stevenson and N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
