Cases 31 - 40 of 97
SIMMONS v. OWENS et al
as 1:2018cv02262
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY SIMMONS
Defendant:
J. SCISM, KNIGHT, OWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01984
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE (WITNESS), JOHN DOE (OFFICER) and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. MELLISA et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Defendant:
DAWSON, JOHNSON, LISA and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. CARTER et al
as 2:2017cv00462
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, HILL, FRANK LITTLEJOHN and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME MICHAEL OWENS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. PENDLETON CORR. FAC. et al
as 1:2017cv02146
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and PENDLETON CORR. FAC.
Plaintiff:
LAMON OWENS
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. SPARKS et al
as 1:2015cv00421
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. and FRANKLIN SPARKS
Plaintiff:
DAVID OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN CLEAVE v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2014cv00349
Defendant:
BARNES, ROBERT BURNS, K. BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL K. VAN CLEAVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. LUNSFORD et al
as 1:2013cv01636
Defendant:
D. FOUNTAIN and B. LUNSFORD
Plaintiff:
TRENTON OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANCLEAVE v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2013cv01586
Defendant:
ARAMARK, BARNES, ROBERT BURNS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL K. VANCLEAVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORDRAY v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00113
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CORDRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
