Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Jenkins v. Carolina Center for Occupational Health
as 2:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Travis Jerome Jenkins
Defendant:
Carolina Center for Occupational Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stepheney v. Wilson et al
as 1:2011cv03261
Plaintiff:
Wade Stepheney, Jr
Defendant:
Cynthia Wilson, Paul G Bidwell, Lisa T Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Morton et al
as 8:2011cv02674
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lewis Jackson
Defendant:
C Morton and Chris Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Stokes et al
as 5:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darren S Simmons
Defendant:
Shelly Stokes , Roland McFadden , Robin Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv01968
Plaintiff:
Donald H Jenkins
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowell v. Ozmint et al
as 3:2010cv01959
Plaintiff:
Herbert McDowell
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Ann Hallman and Vera Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2010cv01551
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Mark Sanford, Warden Pate and others
Plaintiff:
Frank R Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturkey et al
as 8:2010cv01479
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Sturkey, Frank Jenkins, Michael J Brice and others
Defendant:
Ms Freeman, Jon Ozmint, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Bamberg et al
as 6:2010cv00368
Defendant:
Willie Bamberg, County 38 and Orangeburg-Calhoun Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al
as 8:2009cv03293
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jenkins
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Gregory Knowlin , Sherri Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
